Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Saturday, 30 June 2007 12:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > Sorry, but I can't resist the opportunity to say "Send a patch!" :)
> > > > 
> > > > Seriously, though, I'd prefer not to. If we rename that acpi video flags 
> > > > variable (I assume this is what you're thinking of), we only create cause for 
> > > > confusion. A variable should for debugging or for controlling quirks, not for 
> > > > both at the same time.
> > > 
> > > Cause for confusion? We are currently using 2 bits of that variable,
> > > and we want to add one more bit. I seriously doubt that can confuse
> > > anyone.
> > 
> > Well, indeed it would be more elegant to rename the existing flags variable
> > and use another bit out of it, but I personally don't think it's _that_
> > important.  At least, I don't think we should block the patch
> > because of that.
> 
> It is not _that_ important.
> 
> > BTW, has anyone confirmed that it works on i386?
> 
> If you have patch somewhere nearby, I can test it on i386 and make it
> use just one flags variable.

http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.22-rc6/patches/28-Optional-Beeping-During-Resume-From-RAM.patch

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/