Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18

[Vegard Nossum]

On 7/3/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> does it still get more CPU time than you'd expect it to get? A reniced
> or SCHED_IDLE task will 'fill in' any idle time that it senses, so in
> itself it's not an anomaly if a task gets 50% and FEH fills in the
> remaining 50%. Does it still get CPU time if you start two CPU hogs:
>
>    for (( N=0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done
>
> ? If yes, that would be an anomaly.

No, with this test, it gets the expected amount of CPU. Thanks for
clearing it up!

Vegard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/