Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality,performance and maintenance

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Mon Jul 09 2007 - 11:45:53 EST


On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, David Miller wrote:

> From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:49:52 -0700
>
> > A cmpxchg is less costly than interrupt enabe/disable
>
> This is cpu dependant, and in fact not true at all on Niagara
> and several of the cpus in the UltraSPARC family.

Hmmm... So have alternate aloc/free paths depending on the cpu?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/