Re: [PATCH v2 -mm 8/9] netconsole: Support multiple logging targets

From: Duane Griffin
Date: Tue Jul 10 2007 - 06:23:27 EST


On 10/07/07, Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ /* Avoid taking lock and disabling interrupts unnecessarily */
+ if (unlikely(list_empty(&target_list)))
+ return;

Is the unlikely a good idea here? Not having any targets may be
unusual but it isn't ridiculous. It might even be a sensible default
for distros. My (very limited) understanding of unlikely is that it
could impose a very large penalty in that case and would make a very
marginal difference at best in the common case.

Cheers,
Duane.

--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/