Re: [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration

[Ingo Molnar]

* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How do you feel about some variant of this going into 2.6.23-rc1?  I 
> initially thought of this as a 2.6.24 thing, but as it now looks 
> solid, maybe we can hurry things along.

yeah, fine by me. You were working on a more generic patch, right? I 
think a good approach would be an atomic notifier chain.

> If Shaohua ports his spinlock->mutex convertion to the sched branch, 
> we get some real benefits:
> 
> - reduced latencies for desktop users
> - less kvm patches to carry in -rt (maybe none?)

yeah, and i think we can reach 'none'.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/