Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch fixes (try #2)

[Bryan Wu]

On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 20:44 +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 7/4/07, Jan Dittmer <jdi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On 7/3/07, Jan Dittmer <jdi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> Bryan Wu wrote:
> >>>>> Jie's patch is required because we will release our new Blackfin toolchain.
> >>>> So, what is the new toolchain version?
> >>>> gcc 4.1.1 (adi 07r1) / binutils 2.17 doesn't seem to work anymore:
> >>> we'll post new toolchain binaries in a bit
> >> Hrm, somehow I don't understand it. On [1] you're
> >> talking about gcc 4.1.2 and binutils 2.17 supporting
> >> the -mcpu switch. But if you download the 2007R1 RC9
> >> toolchain from the Files section of the site (tar.gz)
> >> you actually get 4.1.1 without mcpu support. But the
> >> version string from gcc indicates 07r1.
> >> Care to explain?
> > 
> > the syntax of the -mcpu option was extended
> 
> With the current -elf toolchain from svn (-uclinux toolchain fails to
> build) I get the following error:
> 
>   CC      fs/binfmt_script.o
>   CC      fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.o
>   CC      fs/binfmt_flat.o
> fs/binfmt_flat.c: In function âdecompress_execâ:
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:293: warning: label âoutâ defined but not used
> fs/binfmt_flat.c: In function âload_flat_fileâ:
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:462: warning: format â%xâ expects type âunsigned intâ,
> but argument 3 has type âlong intâ
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:462: warning: format â%xâ expects type âunsigned intâ,
> but argument 4 has type âlong intâ
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:549: warning: passing argument 1 of âksizeâ makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:601: warning: passing argument 1 of âksizeâ makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:760:50: error: macro "flat_get_addr_from_rp" requires 4
> arguments, but only 3 given
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: âflat_get_addr_from_rpâ undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
> only once
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:760: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [fs/binfmt_flat.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2
> make: *** [_all] Error 2
> 
> Expected?
> 
> Jan

Yes, It should be, because a binfmt_flat patch hacking by blackfin is
not merged by mainline. Please apply the 2 patches in the SVN trunk
uclinux-dist/bfin_patch/lkml_patch/ and you can find the information
about these 2 patches in uclinux-dist/bfin_patch/lkml_patch/README.

Thanks
- Bryan Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/