Re: -mm merge plans -- anti-fragmentation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:11:45PM -0500, Dave McCracken wrote:
> Ok, maybe disaster is too strong a word.  But any kind of order>0 allocation 
> still has to be approached with fear and caution, with a well tested fallback 
> in the case of the inevitable failures.  How many driver writers would have 
> benefited from using order>0 pages, but turned aside to other less optimal 
> solutions due to their unreliability?  We don't know, and probably never 
> will.  Those people have moved on and won't revisit that design decision.

If you look at almost any other OS they use high-order pages quite a lot.
At least Solaris, IRIX and UnixWare do.

Also not that once we have a high-order pagecache it gives a nice way
to simply reclaim a high-order page directly :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/