Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

[Chris Wright]

* Andi Kleen (andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The equivalent to the powerpc way would be essentially to report i386
> into the x86-64 code base and leave the really old hardware only
> in arch/i386. I've considered doing it, but it would be an awful
> lot of work and to tempt distributions to actually use the new
> port would require going back quite a long time. And at least
> immediately it would end up with three cases to do things instead
> of two like currently.

Well that's just silly.  The right way will never create 3 ways, but
always keep the limit to the existing 2 where the differences aren't
worth reconciling, and 1 for anything that is common.

It will be a fair amount of work, so any constructive input you have
upfront would be helpful.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/