On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:58:18PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:ok a proper fix is always better than a workaround ;)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:40:33PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0200, Adel Gadllah wrote:I do. Right now it's either 2 or 4 patches away from mainline sparse,
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/kernel.hAl Viro recently gave a hint that he have patches for sparse to not give
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -35,7 +35,11 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
#define ALIGN(x,a) __ALIGN_MASK(x,(typeof(x))(a)-1)
#define __ALIGN_MASK(x,mask) (((x)+(mask))&~(mask))
+#ifdef __CHECKER_
+#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
+#else
#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
+#endif
spurious ARRAY_SIZE warnings.
depending on reordering... I'm splitting the last patch in series,
hopefully will reorder and send tonight.
Basically, it's a matter of getting __builtin_compatible_types_p()
implementation (really - evaluate.c:type_difference()) somewhere sane.
Try git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/sparse.git/,
the branch is type_difference