[patch] Avoid too many remote cpu references due to /proc/stat
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Date: Thu Jul 12 2007 - 20:09:42 EST
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:06:15PM -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Too many remote cpu references due to /proc/stat.
>
> On x86_64, with newer kernel versions, kstat_irqs is a bit of a problem.
> On every call to kstat_irqs, the process brings in per-cpu data from all
> online cpus. Doing this for NR_IRQS, which is now 256 + 32 * NR_CPUS
> results in (256+32*63) * 63 remote cpu references on a 64 cpu config.
> /proc/stat is parsed by common commands like top, who etc, causing
> lots of cacheline transfers
>
> This statistic seems useless. Other 'big iron' arches disable this.
> Can we disable computing/reporting this statistic? This piece of
> statistic is not human readable on x86_64 anymore,
>
> If not, can we optimize computing this statistic so as to avoid
> too many remote references (patch to follow)
Optimize show_stat to collect per-irq information just once.
On x86_64, with newer kernel versions, kstat_irqs is a bit of a problem.
On every call to kstat_irqs, the process brings in per-cpu data from all
online cpus. Doing this for NR_IRQS, which is now 256 + 32 * NR_CPUS
results in (256+32*63) * 63 remote cpu references on a 64 cpu config.
Considering the fact that we already compute this value per-cpu, we can
save on the remote references as below.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <alok.kataria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-2.6.22/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2007-07-11 14:32:33.013197741 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2007-07-12 16:28:24.871389279 -0700
@@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p,
unsigned long jif;
cputime64_t user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal;
u64 sum = 0;
+ unsigned int *per_irq_sum;
+
+ per_irq_sum = kzalloc(sizeof(unsigned int)*NR_IRQS, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!per_irq_sum)
+ return -ENOMEM;
user = nice = system = idle = iowait =
irq = softirq = steal = cputime64_zero;
@@ -461,8 +466,11 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p,
irq = cputime64_add(irq, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.irq);
softirq = cputime64_add(softirq, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.softirq);
steal = cputime64_add(steal, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.steal);
- for (j = 0 ; j < NR_IRQS ; j++)
- sum += kstat_cpu(i).irqs[j];
+ for (j = 0 ; j < NR_IRQS ; j++) {
+ unsigned int temp = kstat_cpu(i).irqs[j];
+ sum += temp;
+ per_irq_sum[j] += temp;
+ }
}
seq_printf(p, "cpu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu\n",
@@ -500,7 +508,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p,
#if !defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && !defined(CONFIG_ALPHA) && !defined(CONFIG_IA64)
for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++)
- seq_printf(p, " %u", kstat_irqs(i));
+ seq_printf(p, " %u", per_irq_sum[i]);
#endif
seq_printf(p,
@@ -515,6 +523,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p,
nr_running(),
nr_iowait());
+ kfree(per_irq_sum);
return 0;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/