[PATCH] pure_initcall ID inconsistency

[Michael Buesch]

pure_initcall uses the same ID as core_initcall.
I guess that's a typo and it should use its own ID.

Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/init.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/init.h	2007-05-26 19:56:35.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/init.h	2007-07-14 15:59:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void prepare_namespace(void);
  *
  * This only exists for built-in code, not for modules.
  */
-#define pure_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("0",fn,1)
+#define pure_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("0",fn,0)
 
 #define core_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("1",fn,1)
 #define core_initcall_sync(fn)		__define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/