Re: [PATCH] add __GFP_ZERO to GFP_LEVEL_MASK

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Personally I like the consistency of adding __GFP_ZERO here (removes
> > this odd exception) and just masking it in the sl[aou]b thingies.

Adds more code. GFP_LEVEL_MASK are the flags passed through to the 
page allocator. Neither __GFP_ZERO nor __GFP_DMA are passed through and 
therefore they are not part of the GFP_LEVEL_MASK.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/