Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:39:02 EST
On Tuesday, 24 July 2007 00:27, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 08:05:21 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday, 23 July 2007 15:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > As we all know, pageflags have been a scarce resource for a while now.
> These
> > > patches seek to help address that issue by adding support for a new type
> > > of 'dynamically allocated' pageflag.
> > >
> > > The basic idea is that we use per node & zone bitmaps built out of order
> zero
> > > allocations, to replace bits in page->flags. Bitmaps can be sparse, being
> > > populated when a bit on the page is set, and returning zero for all bits
> in
> > > sparse pages. Untested hotplug support is included.
> > >
> > > This method of storing the data does of course come with a performance
> hit.
> > > I've included some simple timing loops in #ifdef'd code that help quantify
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Interestingly, the new implementation is actually quicker under some
> > > circumstances. In cases where the usage pattern involves operating on the
> > > flags for a number of pages in succession, the hit involved in getting the
> > > struct pages from main memory appears to be greater than that involved in
> > > calculating which unsigned long and bit to test.
> > >
> > > Tested only on UP (x86_64) so far.
> >
> > How does it compare to the memory bitmaps used by swsusp, defined in
> > kernel/power/snapshot.c?
>
> Looking through kernel/power/snapshot.c, I'd say this implementation has
> advantages in having support for memory hotplugging, sparseness and random
> access to the flags in the bitmap. Like the snapshot.c implementation, it
> uses per-zone bitmaps and has a method that can be used to iterate over the
> contents of a bitmap. Having per-node support might also be useful. I haven't
> looked at the speed of the snapshot.c implementation.
Well, that's what I'm really interested in.
> Do you see advantages to snapshot.c that I might have missed?
Not at the moment, but I need to have a closer look.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/