Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
From: Ulrich Kunitz
Date: Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:01:09 EST
On 07-07-24 16:57 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > $ strace ./cat
> > execve("./cat", ["./cat"], [/* 55 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> > ...
Chuck, my binaries run always into a segmentation violation. So
ENOENT is not the issue. (Notify it was on an x86-64.)
> > $ file cat
> > cat: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> >
> > Funny nobody noticed that before...
> >
>
> After installing klibc.so and klibc-<ID>.so into /lib everything works:
>
> Program Headers:
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
> PHDR 0x000034 0x08048034 0x08048034 0x0000a0 0x0000a0 R E 0x4
> INTERP 0x0000d4 0x080480d4 0x080480d4 0x00002a 0x00002a R 0x1
> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/klibc-58kBUyV_qhVvkMnaxy8A7N8rLak.so]
>
Yes, these files were present in the initrd.img file. I checked it
by unpacking the initrd.img file. Notify also that I used
git-bisect to identify the PIE patch. This requires successful
builds. Reverting the patch clearly resolved the issue at the end.
> Ulrich, did your initrd contain the correct .so?
Sure! I have only one klibc-*.so on my box in /lib. I diffed the
file in the unpacked initrd.img with the file in /lib and there
has been no difference.
I always recreate the initial ramdisk after the kernel rebuild
with make install and my own installkernel script, which uses
mkinitramfs. The mkinitramfs script ensures that the klibc so
object from /lib and the klibc binaries from /usr/lib/klibc/bin
are copied into the initrd image. Usually that works without any
issue on x86, x86-64. PPC can't use make install, but I use
mkinitramfs there too, which handles klibc the same way.
> Did you try rebuilding klibc after building the new kernel?
Rebuilding klibc doesn't make sense from my point of view. What
should be the point of it?
--
Uli Kunitz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/