Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies

[John Sigler]

John Sigler wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > add 'notrace' to the definition of read_tsc in arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
>
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 271 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 275 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 290 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 297 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 345 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 358 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 384 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 392 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 395 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 396 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1031 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1100 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1105 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1106 us user-latency.
>
> Here's the function trace for the 1106-µs latency:
>
> http://linux.kernel.free.fr/latency/1106-us-trace.txt
>
> These two lines repeat ~2000 times for ~800 µs:
>
> softirq--4     0....  272us : __lock_text_start (rt_run_flush)
> softirq--4     0....  272us : rt_spin_unlock (rt_run_flush)
>
> With a pair of the following in the middle:
>
> softirq--4     0....  670us : call_rcu (rt_run_flush)
> softirq--4     0D..1  670us : __rcu_advance_callbacks (call_rcu)
>
> PID 4 is [softirq-timer/0] and has priority 50 in SCHED_FIFO.
> My process has priority 80 in SCHED_RR. It is waiting for IRQ10.
>
> # cat /proc/interrupts
>            CPU0
>   0:         37    XT-PIC-XT        timer
>   1:          2    XT-PIC-XT        i8042
>   2:          0    XT-PIC-XT        cascade
>   7:          0    XT-PIC-XT        acpi
>  10:  151250933    XT-PIC-XT        eth2, Dta1xx
>  11:      12435    XT-PIC-XT        eth0
>  12:          4    XT-PIC-XT        eth1
>  14:      17154    XT-PIC-XT        ide0
> NMI:          0
> LOC:    5786548
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0

Any idea what went wrong in the above function trace?
Why is the kernel spinning in circles that way?

Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/