[PATCH] fix 'dynreloc miscount' link error on Powerpc
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Thu Jul 26 2007 - 01:53:01 EST
Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx> reported:
2.6.23-rc1 breaks the build for 64-bit powerpc for me (using
maple_defconfig):
LD vmlinux.o
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: dynreloc miscount for
kernel/built-in.o, section .opd
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: can not edit opd Bad value
make: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 1
However, I see a possibly related binutils patch:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/33650
It was tracked down to be caused by the weak prototype
declaration in mm.h:
__attribute__((weak)) const char *arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
But there is no need to make the declaration weak - only the definition
needs to be marked weak. So drop the weak declaration.
And in the process drop the duplicate definition in page.h for powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Note - the arch_vma_name fix for x86_64 needs to be applied first to avoid breaking x86_64
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/page.h b/include/asm-powerpc/page.h
index 10c51f4..236a921 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/page.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/page.h
@@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ extern void copy_user_page(void *to, void *from, unsigned long vaddr,
extern int page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn);
struct vm_area_struct;
-extern const char *arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
#include <asm-generic/memory_model.h>
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index c456c3a..3e9e8fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ void drop_slab(void);
extern int randomize_va_space;
#endif
-__attribute__((weak)) const char *arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+const char * arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/