[PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Jul 29 2007 - 08:22:23 EST


On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require
> > quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures.
>
> Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind.
>
> Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already
> sent out. This is all intertwined..

OK, it took more time than I had hoped, but I wanted CONFIG_HIBERNATION and
CONFIG_SUSPEND to be really independent of each other.

The two patches in the next messages implement the idea:
* replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION
* introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary,
and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each
other.

Greetings,
Rafael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/