Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs onsoftware raid 5
From: Justin Piszcz
Date: Mon Jul 30 2007 - 17:12:34 EST
- Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU"
- Previous message: Zach Brown: "Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct_IO() return val"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5"
- Next in thread: Theodore Tso: "Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Extrapolating these %cpu number makes ZFS the fastest.
Are you sure these numbers are correct?
Note, that %cpu numbers for fuse filesystems are inherently skewed,
because the CPU usage of the filesystem process itself is not taken
into account.
So the numbers are not all that good, but according to the zfs-fuse
author it hasn't been optimized yet, so they may improve.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This was performed on an E6300, 1 core was ZFS/FUSE (or quite a bit of it
anyway)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU"
- Previous message: Zach Brown: "Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct_IO() return val"
- In reply to: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5"
- Next in thread: Theodore Tso: "Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]