Re: [PATCH] create CONFIG_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> Without this change, it is possible to build CONFIG_HIBERNATE
> on all !SMP architectures, but not necessarily their SMP versions.

Did you want to say "CONFIG_SUSPEND"?

> I don't know for sure if the architecture list under SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> is correct.  For now it simply matches the list for
> SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE.

I do not think it is.

> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Kconfig |    7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index 412859f..ccf6576 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ config PM_TRACE
>  	CAUTION: this option will cause your machine's real-time clock to be
>  	set to an invalid time after a resume.
>  
> +config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> +	bool
> +	depends on (X86 && !X86_VOYAGER) || (PPC64 && (PPC_PSERIES ||

At least ARM can do suspend, too... probably others. I was under
impression that SUSPEND is "supported" by all the architectures, just
some of them veto it at runtime (using pm_ops or how was it renamed).
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/