Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

[Oliver Neukum]

Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:

> Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume()
> callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them
> built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-)

These are what USB runtime power management uses. How many code
paths for power management do you want to introduce?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/