Re: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement

[Ingo Molnar]

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > _after_ the dup_task_struct(). Then change sched_fork() to return a 
> > CPU number - hence we dont have a separate sched_fork_suggest_cpu() 
> > initialization function, only one, obvious sched_fork() function. 
> > Agreed?
> 
> That puts task struct, kernel stack, thread info on the wrong node.

ok, i missed that - your patch looks then fine to me.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/