Re: [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support forstacked devices.

[Neil Brown]

On Wednesday August 1, john@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> In any case, why does something so complicated need to be a macro, why
> not a function instead?

There needs to be a macro so you can put a statement after it to be
executed "for each ..."
But you are right that it doesn't all need to be in the one macro.

The idea of something like

#define bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, _i, offset, _size) \
	for (bio_iterator_init(bio, &_i, &bv, offset, _size);	\
	     i.remaining > 0 ;					\
	     bio_next(bio, &_i, &bv))
	
with bio_iterator_init and bio_next being (inline?) functions is a
very good one.  I'll see what works.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/