Re: [RFC 12/26] ext2 white-out support

[Ph. Marek]

On Mittwoch, 1. August 2007, Josef Sipek wrote:
> Alright not the greatest of examples, there is something to be said about
> symmetry, so...let me try again :)
...
> Oops! There's a whiteout in /b that hides the directory in /c -- rename(2)
> shouldn't make directory subtrees disappear.
>
> There are two ways to solve this:
>
> 1) "cp -r" the entire subtree ...
>
> 2) Don't store whiteouts within branches ...
Sorry for making uninformed guesses, but if there are already special nodes 
(whiteout), why not extending them to some more general format - specifying a 
(source, destination) pair at the topmost level?
- A delete is a (source, NULL) pair
- A rename is a (source, destination) pair, which causes lookups on source to
  use the string destination in the lower branches.


Would that work?


Regards,

Phil

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/