(off-topic) Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

[Stefan Richter]

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Robert, Stefan, I am sorry, I think, you are VERY wrong here.

You meant to say "C99 is very wrong".

> And, Stefan, there is a perfect way to specify a "0123" without the '\0' - 
> {'0', '1', '2', '3'}.

C99 says char c[4] = "0123"; is a perfect way to say char c[4] = {'0',
'1', '2', '3'};.  Do you want gcc to choose otherwise and ban the former
of the two idioms?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =--- ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/