Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

[Carlo Florendo]

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > C99 spec that Al referred you to (available for around US$18 as a pdf)
> > says in 6.7.8, para. 14 (where Al said):
> >
> > "An array of character type may be initialized by a character string literal, optionally
> > enclosed in braces. Successive characters of the character string literal (including the
> > terminating null character if there is room or if the array is of unknown size) initialize the
> > elements of the array."
>
> Wow... So, the terminating '\0' in the string constant IS "special" and 
> "optional"... Ok, then, THIS does answer my question, THIS I can 
> understand, and, ghm, accept...
>
> Thanks to all who tried to explain this to me and sorry it took so long...

You should not have asked in the first place.  The declaration

char c[4] = "abcd"

is perfectly valid. There is no cause for debate about it :)

Thank you very much.

Best Regards,

Carlo

--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, UP Campus Diliman
1101 Quezon City, Philippines
http://www.astra.ph

--
The Astra Group of Companies
5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City
Tokyo 206-0011, Japan
http://www.astra.co.jp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/