Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:40 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:47:56AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
[....]
> >While we're talking of null-termination of strings, then I bet you
> >generally want to be using strlcpy(), really. Often strncpy() isn't
> >what you want. Of course, if that buffer isn't a string at all, then
> >you should be using memfoo() functions and not strbar() ones in the
> >first place ...
> 
> Afaik, strlcpy() and strlcat() are NOT standard C library functions.

Yes, because they are not old enough as they are results of lessons
learned with strncpy() and strcpy() and other buffer overflows.

> But, I know, they are available in Linux kernel. ;) And yes, they
> are better than strn{cpy,cat}().

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/