Re: per bdi dirty balancing (was Re: kupdate weirdness)

[Miklos Szeredi]

> > My plan is to extract the minimal set of features from your patchset,
> > that solves the dirty balancing deadlocks and submit them as quickly
> > as possible.
> 
> I had hoped to post a new version yesterday, but lets hope for today.

Would be cool.

> > After that we can look at trying to solve the more ambitious problem
> > of the slow vs. fast devices in a way that not only you can understand ;)
> 
> Drad, and here I thought all that documentation in the proportions lib
> would have solved that :-(

Well, I didn't get that far, and only had a glimpse of the proportions
lib.  But my hunch is that there's still lots of room for simplification.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/