Re: Scheduler Situation

[Oleksandr Natalenko]

T. J. Brumfield <enderandrew <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 1 - Can someone please explain why the kernel can be modular in every
> other aspect, including offering a choice of IO schedulers, but not
> kernel schedulers?

IMHO, Linus has a grudge against Con, but I can't understand, why. Con has 
written nice code, I use it even now, I'm glad to have nice high-interactive 
system on desktop. But "a grudge" is not an argument for Linus, it's better not 
to make a decision by himself, but to let the community to decide, what is 
better - CFS or SD.

Question is not only in CFS vs SD, but in -ck patchset. Linus must remember 
that he has lost nice code and nice maintainer, and it's not a right decision. 
Linux is a public OS, so let people decide themselves, but not Linus himself.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/