Re: [NFS] rpc.mountd crashes when extensively using netgroups

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:01:09PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> The core issue is this:
> 
>  We need to map IPADDRESS to THING, and  THING + PATH to EXPORTPOINT.
> (roughly).
> So what do we choose for "THING"?
> 
> One obvious option is the dotted quad of the IP address.
> People tend to have large sets of similar clients, so doing this seems
> to be missing out on a valuable optimisation and adding bloat to the
> lookup tables in the kernel.

$ gdb vmlinux
GNU gdb 6.6-debian
...
(gdb) print sizeof(struct ip_map)
$1 = 40
(gdb) print sizeof(struct svc_export)
$2 = 136

Hm, OK, one-address-per-export loses.

> I guess we could use a hash and keep a hash table in mountd.
> So mountd:
>   1/ Generates the comma-separated name as needed, being careful to
>      allocate enough space.
>   2a/ If this is small enough, write it to the kernel as is.
>   2b/ If it is too big, Find it in a table (adding if needed) and 
>       write the address of the table entry to the kernel
> 
>   When a THING + PATH request arrives:
>     If THING looks like an address in the table, do the lookup to get
>     the string.
> 
> This would work to keep the strings in the kernel shorter, but is
> rather ugly - storing in the kernel addresses in a user-space program.

If you use an actual collision-free hash function then the result will
be reproduceable, so you don't have to depend on temporary information
in mountd.

> So maybe we want to combine the two workable approaches.
> 
> Sometimes IPADDRESS maps to DOTTED_QUAD
> Sometimes IPADDRESS maps to LIST,OF,STRINGS,FROM,ETC,EXPORTS
> 
> Possibly the choice could be based on a command line switch.
> In the absence of such a switch, it could be based on the number of
> entries in /etc/exports.

Seems OK.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/