Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: Claudio Martins
Date: Sat Aug 04 2007 - 20:24:42 EST
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Linux has never been a "suprise your kernel interfaces all just changed
> today" kernel, nor a "gosh you upgraded and didn't notice your backups
> broke" kernel.
>
Can you give examples of backup solutions that rely on atime being updated?
I can understand backup tools using mtime/ctime for incremental backups (like
tar + Amanda, etc), but I'm having trouble figuring out why someone would
want to use atime for that.
Best regards
Claudio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/