Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

[JÃrn Engel]

On Sun, 5 August 2007 10:53:54 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:21:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > btw., Mutt does not go boom, i use it myself. It works just fine and 
> > notices new mails even on a noatime,nodiratime filesystem.
> 
> IIRC, atime is used by mailers and by the shell to detect that new
> mail has arrived and report it only once if there are several intances
> watching the same mbox.
> 
> I too use mutt and noatime,nodiratime everywhere (same 10 year-old
> thinko), and the only side effect is that when I have a new mail,
> it is reported in all of my xterms until I read it, clearly something
> I can live with (and sometimes it's even desirable).
> 
> In fact, mutt is pretty good at this. It updates atime and ctime itself
> as soon as it opens the mbox, so the shell is happy and only reports
> "you have mail" afterwards.

For me mutt fails to recognize new mail.  And the difference might be
this:
http://www.google.de/search?q=enable-buffy-size

JÃrn

-- 
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/