Re: Distributed storage.

From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Sun Aug 05 2007 - 11:02:26 EST


On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:06:58AM -0700, Daniel Phillips (phillips@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > DST original code worked as device mapper plugin too, but its two
> > additional allocations (io and clone) per block request ended up for
> > me as a show stopper.
>
> Ah, sorry, I misread. A show stopper in terms of efficiency, or in
> terms of deadlock?

At least as in terms of efficiency. Device mapper lives in happy world
where memory does not end and allocations are fast.

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/