Re: [patch] implement smarter atime updates support

[Alan Cox]

O> you might want to add
> 
> 	/* 
> 	 * if the inode is dirty already, do the atime update since
> 	 * we'll be doing the disk IO anyway to clean the inode.
> 	 */
> 	if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)
> 		return 1;

This makes the actual result somewhat less predictable. Is that wise ?
Right now its clear what happens based on what user sequence of events
and that this is easily repeatable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/