Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies ofCONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 07:20:53 EST
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
>
> and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.
In fact, just doing
depends on (ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE && !SMP) || (ARCH_SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE && SMP)
would probably be good instead of doing the intermediate
SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE. The reason I like this
better is that we don't have a central editing point where patches
conflict causing unnecessary problems. But both are much better than
what we have now anyway :)
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part