RE: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc2: known regressions with patches
From: Luck, Tony
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 14:45:49 EST
> > Caused-By : Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> > commit 29b71a1ca74491fab9fed09e9d835d840d042690
> A patch was sent to Tony. AFAIK it got accepted, not sure whether it
> already is in any and which git tree...
The suggested patch adds manual padding to the acpi_device_id structure
definition in include/linux/mod_devicetable.h I didn't take it, and it
appears that nobody else did either. It is not in Linus' tree (as of 2.6.23-rc2).
I expressed doubts about whether this is the right fix. The problem
is that when cross-compiling a locally compiled utility makes a size &
alignment check. This is bogus. We shouldn't care whether this structure
compiles to the same size/alignment as the kernel that will use on the
target platform.
Is fixing this the right way (make the scripts/mod/file2alias.c understand
target alignment rules in a cross environment) just too hideous to
contemplate ... and we should just sacrifice 7 bytes of padding in
order to keep life simple?
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/