Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code

[Paul Menage]

On 8/7/07, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The typical annotation would be using spin_lock_nested/mutex_lock_nested
> with a non-0 nesting level for this one case.
>

OK, I'll look into this when I get back from vacation.

Thanks,

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/