Re: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

From: Roman Zippel
Date: Tue Aug 07 2007 - 19:16:38 EST


Hi,

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I'd be surprised if there was significant overhead - the maximum frequency
> at which msleep() can be called is 1000Hz. We'd need an awful lot of
> overhead for that to cause problems, surely?
>
> <thinks he's missing something again>

_Anybody_ has yet to answer what's wrong with adding a nanosleep() and
using that instead.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/