Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]

[David Howells]

James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > +	u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
> 
> To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an 
> error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.

Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
return an error?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/