[PATCH 3/4] signalfd: fix interaction with posix-timers

[Oleg Nesterov]

dequeue_signal:

	if (__SI_TIMER) {
		spin_unlock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
		do_schedule_next_timer(info);
		spin_lock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
	}

Unless tsk == curent, this is absolutely unsafe: nothing prevents tsk from
exiting. If signalfd was passed to another process, do_schedule_next_timer()
is just wrong.

Add yet another "tsk == current" check into dequeue_signal().

This patch fixes an oopsable bug, but breaks the scheduling of posix timers
if the shared __SI_TIMER signal was fetched via signalfd attached to another
sub-thread. Mostly fixed by the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- t/kernel/signal.c~3_SIGFD	2007-08-09 19:59:27.000000000 +0400
+++ t/kernel/signal.c	2007-08-12 19:48:26.000000000 +0400
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *t
 	/* We only dequeue private signals from ourselves, we don't let
 	 * signalfd steal them
 	 */
-	if (tsk == current)
+	if (likely(tsk == current))
 		signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info);
 	if (!signr) {
 		signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->signal->shared_pending,
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *t
 		if (!(tsk->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT))
 			tsk->signal->flags |= SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED;
 	}
-	if ( signr &&
+	if (signr && likely(tsk == current) &&
 	     ((info->si_code & __SI_MASK) == __SI_TIMER) &&
 	     info->si_sys_private){
 		/*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/