Re: [PATCH] Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

[Crispin Cowan]

Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I respect the design decisions that SELinux has made regarding
> granularity without agreeing with them myself. 
>   
It isn't even an exclusive decision: both design points can be "right",
but aimed at different use cases. Which is why LSM exists, so users can
decide on an appropriate mechanism.

Crispin

-- 
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.               http://crispincowan.com/~crispin/
Director of Software Engineering   http://novell.com
	AppArmor Chat: irc.oftc.net/#apparmor

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/