Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

[Jesper Juhl]

On 13/08/07, James Smart <James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok.... here's what happened,
>
> - We changed the define so that it matched what we are using. We never configure
>    more than 4 HBQ, thus the index will never be beyond 0-3. The if-check is actually
>    innoculous. Given that the change wasn't your patch, we didn't include you as
>    the author.
>
And that's not a problem. I only mentioned it to explain how I
searched for the patch before I resend it.

> - Coding-wise, you are right, we still didn't fix the range check.
>
> Since this really is just something to keep the tools happy - I'll recind the NACK.
> I'll worry about simply removing this if-check later...
>
> James/Andrew, accept this patch - ACK.
>


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/