Re: kfree(0) - ok?

[Rene Herman]

On 08/15/2007 09:28 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:

> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > NULL is not 0 though.
> > It is.  Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero,
>
> C guarantees that.

C guarantees what? If you're disagreeing with Jason -- he's right.

> > but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a
> > null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be
> > #defined as 0 or a cast thereof).

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/