Re: [PATCH] Fix VM_FAULT flags conversion for hugetlb

[Nick Piggin]

On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> It seems a simple mistake was made when converting follow_hugetlb_page()
> over to the VM_FAULT flags bitmask stuff:
> 	(commit  83c54070ee1a2d05c89793884bea1a03f2851ed4).
> 
> By using the wrong bitmask, hugetlb_fault() failures are not being
> recognized.  This results in an infinite loop whenever
> follow_hugetlb_page is involved in a failed fault.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Adam. Looks good.

> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index d7ca59d..de4cf45 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ int follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>  			ret = hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, vaddr, 0);
>  			spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> -			if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_MAJOR))
> +			if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
>  				continue;
>  
>  			remainder = 0;
> 
> -- 
> Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
> IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/