Re: [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data

[Neil Brown]

On Thursday August 16, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 2 and 3 are very simple changes that - I think - make it clearer what
> > is happening.
> 
> To be honest, I don't see much win in using blk_rq_data() over
> bio_data() at all. I'd much much rather just see it go away!
> 

Well, as it is always the data at the (current) head of the request...

But I can make it go a way if you like.. What does it become?
bvec_kmap ??

> > And I felt 5 was a sufficient improvement to justify it and 4...
> 
> 5 is nice, I would like to apply that :-)
> 

OK, here comes '5' at the top of a small set of patches.  Take it and
any of the following that you like.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/