Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work()

[Dan Aloni]

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
> 
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync.
> 
> I am not sure we really need to call do_tty_hangup() when cancel_work_sync()
> returns true, but this matches the current behaviour.

I also noticed this problem recently with 2.6.22, on a 2-CPU box where there 
was one SCHED_RR userspace process stuck in a busy loop. The box was completely 
responsive but had this annoyance where all tty closings were stuck in 
flush_scheduled_work(). It's especially noticable when you ssh to the machine
and then try to log out.

A temporary workaround was to give just the workqueue events/* threads a 
SCHED_FIFO static priority of 99, but I have kept that small patch to 
myself (figured it's just too nasty).

-- 
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/