Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on80386 and 80486
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Mon Aug 20 2007 - 16:38:27 EST
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> already present in cmpxchg_386_u32 tells much about how this cmpxchg
> implementation should not be used in a SMP context. However, the cmpxchg_local
> can perfectly use this fallback, since it only needs to be atomic wrt the local
> cpu.
Do you have an example where the use of cmpxchg_local is a performance
benefit when actually used in code? cmpxchg is already problematic
functionality since it is not available on all platforms.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/