Re: [accounting regression since rc1] scheduler updates

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> could you send that precise sched_clock() patch? It should be an order 
> of magnitude simpler than the high-precision stime/utime tracking you 
> already do, and it's needed for quality scheduling anyway.

I have a question about that. I just played with sched_clock, and even when I 
intentionally slow down sched_clock by a factor of 2, my cpu bound process 
gets 100 % in top. If this is intentional, I dont understand how a 
virtualized sched_clock would fix the accounting change?

Thanks

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/