Re: [accounting regression since rc1] scheduler updates

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 21. August 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> > the 'invariant' i mentioned only covers scheduler behavior, not 
> > accounting behavior. Accounting is separate in theory, but coupled in 
> > practice now via sum_exec_runtime.
> 
> Forgot to answer about that: That means that the current design does 
> not cover our requirement of showing process real time, even if we 
> implement sched_clock? In that case I would suggest to merge my patch 
> as a quick but correct solution and do it properly for 2.6.24. Of 
> course better solutions are welcome :-)

you mean to revert b27f03d4bd? I'd really like to see this fixed for 
real for s390 + CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y. (which seems to be the 
only case affected)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/