Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

[Alan Cox]

> out is usually a single byte. Shouldn't be very expensive
> to decode. In fact it should be roughly equivalent to your
> hypercall multiplex.

Why is a performance critical path on a paravirt kernel even using I/O
instructions and not paravirtual device drivers ?

It clearly makes sense to virtualise I/O operations if you are doing that
(so you can do posting, triggers and predicted reply handling guest side
to keep the trap rate sane) but I don't see why this situation occurs in
the first place for paravirt.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/