Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: override "dma_flags_set_dmaflush" for sn-ia64

[Jeremy Higdon]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:39:36AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> >On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:34 -0700, akepner@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >>The term "posted DMA" is used to describe this behavior in the Altix 
> >>Device Driver Writer's Guide, but it may be confusing things here. 
> >>Maybe a better term will suggest itself if I can clarify....
> >
> >OK, but posted DMA has a pretty specific meaning in terms of PCI, hence
> >the confusion.
> 
> Maybe it would be more better to refer to this as 'out of order DMA'?
> 
> >>On Altix, DMA from a device isn't guaranteed to arrive in host memory 
> >>in the order it was sent from the device. This reordering can happen 
> >>in the NUMA interconnect (it's specifically not a PCI reordering.)
> >
> >This is mmiowb and read_relaxed() again, isn't it?
> 
> I believe it's the same problem, except this time it's when exposing
> structures to userland.

Actually, it's a different problem, but with a similar cause.

mmiowb() is for the case PIO (or MMIO) write order from two different CPUs
can invert somewhere in the NL fabric.

read_relaxed() is a performance optimization to avoid the flush that's
necessary to avoid inversion in order between a PIO (or MMIO) read and
a DMA write.

What Arthur's trying to do here is avoid inversion in the order of two
DMA writes.

jeremy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/